|
What is the
Governor's Council?
The Massachusetts Governor's Council (also known as
the Executive Council) is a governmental body that
provides advice and consent in certain matters —
such as judicial nominations, pardons, and
commutations — to the Governor of Massachusetts.
Councillors are elected by the general public and
their duties are set forth in the Massachusetts
Constitution.
Composition
The Council is composed of eight councillors and the
governor or lieutenant governor, who presides over
the Council. The Massachusetts Constitution
specifies that "the governor, and in his absence the
lieutenant governor, shall be president of the
council, but shall have no vote in council: and the
lieutenant governor shall always be a member of the
council except when the chair of the governor shall
be vacant."
The eight councillors are elected every four years,
one each from eight councillor districts. The
Governor's Council districts are specially composed.
Each district consists of the entirety of five
contiguous Massachusetts Senate districts.
There are provisions in the Massachusetts
Constitution for filling unexpected vacancies. If a
seat on the Council becomes vacant, the General
Court may, by concurrent vote, select some person
from the relevant councillor district to fill the
opening. If the General Court is not in session, the
Governor may select the new councillor, with the
advice and consent of the existing Council.
Duties
The Council generally meets at noon on Wednesdays in
its State House Chamber, next to the Governor's
Office. Pursuant to the Massachusetts Constitution,
the Governor may, in general and at his discretion,
from time to time assemble the Council for the
ordering and directing the affairs of the
commonwealth. In addition, the Governor must seek
the advice and consent of the Council with respect
to nominations of judicial officers, appointment and
removal of notaries public and justices of the
peace, issuance of pardons and communtations, and
payment of monies from the treasury. The Council
recently came under scrutiny after certain members
employed peculiar and aggressive tactics to oppose
distinguished judicial nominees.
* Certain parts of this text has been taken from
Wikipedia
|